California Legislature Looks to Rein In Certain CIPA Claims Through SB 690: Miller and Sperling Publish Bloomberg Law Analysis

Article
|
|
Bloomberg Law

Glaser Weil litigation partners Sarah G. Miller and Elizabeth Sperling have co-authored a new Bloomberg Law article, “California Bill Could Curb Privacy Lawsuits Hitting Businesses,” examining California Senate Bill 690 and its potential impact on the growing wave of privacy litigation targeting businesses nationwide.

As website-tracking and consumer privacy lawsuits continue to proliferate under California's Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA), SB 690 represents one of the most significant legislative efforts to date to address claims arising from so-called "pen register" and "trap and trace" allegations. If enacted, the bill could substantially limit private lawsuits asserting that businesses unlawfully track IP addresses or browser activity through common website technologies.

Miller and Sperling explain that CIPA, originally enacted in 1967 to address telephone wiretapping, has increasingly been applied to modern website technologies, resulting in a surge of litigation against companies using tools such as analytics platforms, chat functions and other online tracking mechanisms. The authors note that inconsistent court rulings have created significant uncertainty for businesses, prompting numerous lawsuits and demand letters seeking quick settlements.

The article highlights several important developments and considerations, including:

  • How SB 690 would narrow private enforcement
  • The continued risk associated with Section 631(a) claims
  • The significance of the bill's retroactivity provisions
  • Why businesses should proactively audit their websites
  • The importance of maintaining effective privacy notices, cookie banners and consent-management tools
  • The potential for litigation to shift to other legal theories

While SB 690 could provide meaningful relief from certain categories of privacy litigation, Miller and Sperling caution that businesses should not view the legislation as a complete solution. Companies should continue evaluating their privacy compliance programs and website technologies to mitigate risk under both California and federal privacy laws.

Read the article to learn more.

Related Attorneys

  • Sarah G. Miller (Hartman)
    Partner
  • Elizabeth Sperling
    Partner and Co-chair of the Banking and Financial Services Practice

Related Practices

Jump to Page

Glaser Weil Cookie Preference Center Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek