Hadley Quoted in ‘The New York Times’ on Smucker’s Lawsuit Over Uncrustables Trademark

Quoted
|
|
The New York Times

Glaser Weil Intellectual Property Partner and Chair Lawrence M. Hadley was quoted in The New York Times article titled “Can You Trademark Peanut Butter and Jelly? Smucker’s Says Yes.,” regarding J.M. Smucker’s recent trademark infringement lawsuit against Trader Joe’s. The case centers on Smucker’s claim that Trader Joe’s crustless peanut butter and jelly sandwiches are a copycat of its Uncrustables product.

Hadley explained that trademark infringement cases often hinge on consumer confusion. He noted that Trader Joe’s is likely to argue that its product is distinct and that its branding clearly signals to consumers that they are not purchasing a Smucker’s product. Drawing a comparison to the experience of buying Kirkland-branded items at Costco, Hadley said, “People going to Trader Joe’s understand that when they buy a sandwich, even if it doesn’t have a crust and is shaped in a certain way and you can heat it up in a toaster oven, it’s not a Smucker’s.”

Read the full article on The New York Times (subscription required).

Related Attorneys

  • Lawrence M. Hadley
    Partner, Chair of the Intellectual Property Department, and Co-chair of the Investigations, Compliance and Strategic Response Practice

Related Practices

Jump to Page

Necessary Cookies

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. You may disable these by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Analytical Cookies

Analytical cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.